• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Initiative for Interstellar Studies

Working towards the achievement of interstellar flight through knowledge to the stars - Starships in our lifetime

  • What we do
    • Education
      • Education
      • ISU Projects
      • Starship Engineer
      • SF Starships
      • STEM & Schools
      • Talk Series
      • Exploring Equations
      • LSI Summer Course
    • Technical
      • Project Dragonfly
      • Andromeda Probe
      • Project Glowworm
      • Project Lyra – Exploring Interstellar Objects
      • von Neumann AI Probe
      • Project World Ship
    • Sustainability
    • Enterprise
    • The Alpha Centauri Prize
    • X-Projects
    • I4IS-USA
    • In the media
  • Who we are
    • About Us
    • Board of Directors
    • Education
    • Researchers
    • Managers
    • Team i4is Gallery
    • Interstellar artists
      • David A Hardy
      • Adrian Mann
      • Alex Storer
      • Terry Regan
    • Contact us
  • Events
  • Publications
    • Principium
    • Axiom
    • Monographs & Reports
    • Books
    • App
    • Team Publications
    • Useful Resources
  • Blog
  • News
  • Members
    • Join Now
    • Login
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Starship Blog / Was Loeb’s Bolide Interstellar?

Was Loeb’s Bolide Interstellar?

1 September 2023

Adam Hibberd

Loeb's interstellar spherules have caused controversy and indignation amongst experts in the science community.

For those of you not-in-the-know, Loeb travelled to the site of a proposed interstellar meteor (his designation: IM1) which he had identified in a catalogue of bolides held by NASA and then discovered in the ocean tiny metallic blobs he purports to be of extrasolar composition. He even suggests that IM1 could have been tech made by an alien civilization.

Scientists around the world have raised myriad concerns over the claim. Let me elucidate on some.

Firstly, Loeb dredged the specific region of the ocean he was interested in and did NOT sufficiently investigate a wider area of the ocean. This would have then enabled a better determination of whether these spherules originated from IM1 or were just generally distributed background noise (so not associated with IM1).

Secondly with an iron-rich object travelling through the atmosphere at a speed of 45 km/s the intensity of the explosions would have produced only a small quanitity of spherules (if any at all).

Thirdly if the spherules did impact on the ocean surface, they would sink very slowly and by assuming 'Stokes Flow' over a depth of 2-3km, they would have been carried away to distant locations by currents and so there would be unlikely any under the path of the meteor.

There are other concerns which I shan't articulate here but you get the general idea.

He seems to want to be proved RIGHT about his proposal that 'Oumuamua is alien technology, and will go to extraordinary lengths to do so apart from possibly the most obvious way of doing this - actually MOUNTING A MISSION (in other words PROJECT LYRA).


Primary Sidebar

Blog

Members Newsletter – August

28 August 2026

Interstellar Symposium: Register Now! The Interstellar Research Group (IRG) is pleased to announce that registration is now open for the 2nd European Interstellar Symposium, taking place December 2 to 4, 2026, in Venice, Italy. This special symposia is hosted by The Venetian Institute of Sciences, Letters and Arts in association with The Interstellar Research Group and […]

How long does it take to get to the Sun/Earth L4 Point from Earth?

18 August 2026

Adam Hibberd Let’s say we eject a spacecraft with a small velocity decrement in the opposite direction to Earth’s own velocity around the Sun, what will happen to it exactly? It will stay around Earth’s heliocentric orbit since its velocity is close to Earth’s, however we shall assume that the spacecraft flies outside of Earth’s […]

What is 1998 KY26?

6 August 2026

Adam Hibberd I was recently referred to a paper by Farnocchia et al which apparently, so was it argued, contradicted the notion that 1998 KY26 could be technogenic (man made), in other words a spacecraft. For the uninitiated, 1998 KY26 has always been considered (up-to-recently at least) a Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) of some form […]

Members Newsletter – July

31 July 2026

News from i4is I4is return to the Royal Institution, London, UKTwo more of our popular workshops “Skateboards to Starships” are returning this summer to the Royal Institution, 21 Albemarle St, London W1S 4BS.24 August 2026 see https://www.rigb.org/whats-on/holiday-workshops-skateboards-starships-year-10-1325 August 2026 see https://www.rigb.org/whats-on/holiday-workshops-skateboards-starships-year-7-9 Europlanet Science Congress 2026The Europlanet Conference takes place in The Hague, The Netherlands from […]

Join i4is for a journey to the stars!

Members get access to exclusive videos. Here's a taster:

Join now

Footer

Contact i4is

Initiative for Interstellar Studies
27/29 South Lambeth Road
London, SW8 1SZ
United Kingdom

info@i4is.org

Starship Blog

Members Newsletter – August

How long does it take to get to the Sun/Earth L4 Point from Earth?

What is 1998 KY26?

Members Newsletter – July

Donate

The Initiative for Interstellar Studies is entirely dependent upon the goodwill of its volunteer teams, the minor amounts we receive from our activities and the sale of our merchandise but also the kindness of donors. In order to advance our mission of achieving interstellar flight over the next century, we need your help and support. If you are feeling generous we would very much appreciate your help in moving our mission forward. Make a donation » about Donate

  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Contact us

Initiative for Interstellar Studies Limited
27-29 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1SZ
Company Limited by Guarantee No: 09062458 (England and Wales)
Copyright © Initiative for Interstellar Studies · Built by Jason King

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}